Reading C1 – Bài 4: Argument – Will AI Replace Skilled Work?

Đọc cả bài một lượt để hiểu ý chính, sau đó đọc lại kỹ. Bấm “Hiện bản dịch” khi cần hỗ trợ tiếng Việt.

1. Predictions about automation have a long history of being confidently wrong.

2. What distinguishes the current wave is that it targets cognitive rather than manual routine.

3. Drafting, summarising and preliminary analysis are precisely the tasks that once justified junior roles.

4. If those rungs disappear, the profession loses the ladder by which expertise was traditionally acquired.

5. Optimists counter that new tools historically create categories of work nobody anticipated.

6. That may be true in aggregate while remaining catastrophic for a specific cohort entering the market now.

7. The policy question, then, is less about employment totals than about who absorbs the transition costs.

Câu hỏi hiểu bài – Kiểm tra đáp án & xem điểm

1. 1. What makes the current wave different?

   It is slowerIt targets cognitive routineIt affects only factoriesIt is government-led

2. 2. Why do junior roles matter, according to the writer?

   They are cheapThey are how expertise is acquiredThey increase profitsThey reduce risk

3. 3. The writer completely dismisses the optimists' argument.

   ĐúngSai

4. 4. Điền cụm: true in ______ but catastrophic for one cohort.

5. 5. What is the real policy question?

   Total employment numbersWho absorbs transition costsWhich tools to banHow fast AI improves